RPS MK Human genetics (Medical genetics)

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Sep

6

Matriks Rencana Pembelajaran Semester MK Genetika Manusia atau Genetika Medik.

 

Week

Lerning Outcome

Focus study

Pokok Bahasan

(topics)

Sub Pokok Bahasan

(subtopics)

Bentuk Pembelajaran

(Learning methods)

Indikator/Kriteria Penilaian

(Value Criteria)

Bobot Nilai

(%)

Fasilitas Pembelajaran

(learning Facility)
1 Understand basic concepts of human genetics Basic concepts of human genetics Lecture and discussion

6

 Laptop, LCD, module
2 Understand Mendelian inheritance patterns of the different types of inheritance patterns of human disease. Identify and  Compare a Mendelian inheritance pattern of different types of inheritance patterns of human disease Mendelian inheritance pattern of human disease Types of inheritance patterns of human disease Mendel law, single gene and polygenetics factors Sex-linked, multifactorial and maternal inheritance Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

6

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
3-4 Understand multigenic inheritance patterns. Identify a multigenic inheritance pattern. Mapping and characterizing “simple” genetic disease Mapping disease genes, disease-associated mutations, diseases associated with a gene loss-function effect, nuclear and mitochondrial genome mutations,  Evolution of a gene cluster and divergence of function Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

18

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
5-6 Understand Gene-environment interaction in behavior related Genomics to the study of complex diseases Identifify Gene-environment interaction in behavior related Genomics to the study of complex diseases Mapping and characterizing “complex” genetic diseases Genomics for the study of complex diseases, genetic study of type 2 diabetes and obesity, Gene-environment interaction in behavior, pharmacogenetics Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

16

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
6-8 Understand the current research into epigenetic and transgenerational inheritance. Explain the basics of epigenetic and transgenerational inheritance. Sex, prions, and epigenetics Epigenetic inheritance of chromatin states / Role of DNA methylation in human disease,dysregulation of the histone modification machinery, transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, sex determination,  prion diseases Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

12

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
9-10 Understand Chromosomal and genomic disorders Identify Chromosomal and genomic disorders Chromosomal and genomic disorders Mechanisms and maternal age influence the origin of aneuploidy in humans, mechanisms causing these aberrations, fragile X syndrome Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

12

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
11-12 Understand the potential implications of personalized and genomic medicine Explain the potential benefits and risks/challenges of genomic medicine. Natural genetics resources: the potential benefits and risks/challenges Pharcogenenomic and/orNutrigenomic:

Bioactive compound, phytopharmaca, functional food for healthy controlling

 Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

6

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
13 Understand some of the ethical issues facing genomic researchers. Explain some of the ethical challenges raised by the prevalence of genomic data Medical genetics and the associated ethical, legal, and social implications Ethical clearanceInform consent

ELSI for medical research based on samples of  human or animal model

 Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

6

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam
14-15 Understand how to interpret data from a genome-wide association (GWA) study and Genetic Testing Analyze data from genome-wide association studies. Genome-wide association (GWA) study and Genetic Testing Genome-wide association (GWA) studyType, across the life span (prenatal, pediatric and adult), technology, molecular, clinical and ethical perspectives Presentation, Lecture and discussion Kebenaran dan ketepatan analisis

16

 Laptop, LCD, module, paper exam

 

Daftar Pustaka

Rick Lewis. 2011. Basic Human Genetics. Routledge Taylor & Francis group, NY ·  ISBN-10: 0415579864 · ISBN-13: 978-0415579865,

Ricki Lewis. 2011. Human Genetics concepts and application. McGraw-Hill Education; 10 edition ISBN-13: 978-0073525303, ISBN-10: 0073525308 or ISBN: 007246268x

Tom Strachan & Andrew Read.2003. Human Molecular genetics. Garland Science; 3 edition. ·  ISBN-10: 0815341822 ·  ISBN-13: 978-0815341826

Julian Knight.2009. Human Genetic Diversity. Oxford Univrsity Press. London.

Robert Nussbaum, Roderick R. McInnes, and Huntington F Willard. 2007. Genetics in Medicine, 7th Edition. Sounders. ·  ISBN: 9781416030805

 

Atau pustaka yang terbaru sesuai dengan materi kuliah

 

How to get published in an academic journal: TOP TIPS from Some EDITORS

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Jul

25

Writing for academic journals is highly competitive. Even if you overcome the first hurdle and generate a valuable idea or piece of research – how do you then sum it up in a way that will capture the interest of reviewers?

There’s no simple formula for getting published – editors’ expectations can vary both between and within subject areas. But there are some challenges that will confront all academic writers regardless of their discipline. How should you respond to reviewer feedback? Is there a correct way to structure a paper? And should you always bother revising and resubmitting? We asked journal editors from a range of backgrounds for their tips on getting published.

The writing stage

1) Focus on a story that progresses logically, rather than chronologically

Take some time before even writing your paper to think about the logic of the presentation. When writing, focus on a story that progresses logically, rather than the chronological order of the experiments that you did.
Deborah Sweet, editor of Cell Stem Cell and publishing director at Cell Press

2) Don’t try to write and edit at the same time

Open a file on the PC and put in all your headings and sub-headings and then fill in under any of the headings where you have the ideas to do so. If you reach your daily target (mine is 500 words) put any other ideas down as bullet points and stop writing; then use those bullet points to make a start the next day.

If you are writing and can’t think of the right word (eg for elephant) don’t worry – write (big animal long nose) and move on – come back later and get the correct term. Write don’t edit; otherwise you lose flow.
Roger Watson, editor-in-chief, Journal of Advanced Nursing

3) Don’t bury your argument like a needle in a haystack

If someone asked you on the bus to quickly explain your paper, could you do so in clear, everyday language? This clear argument should appear in your abstract and in the very first paragraph (even the first line) of your paper. Don’t make us hunt for your argument as for a needle in a haystack. If it is hidden on page seven that will just make us annoyed. Oh, and make sure your argument runs all the way through the different sections of the paper and ties together the theory and empirical material.
Fiona Macaulay, editorial board, Journal of Latin American Studies

4) Ask a colleague to check your work 

One of the problems that journal editors face is badly written papers. It might be that the writer’s first language isn’t English and they haven’t gone the extra mile to get it proofread. It can be very hard to work out what is going on in an article if the language and syntax are poor.
Brian Lucey, editor, International Review of Financial Analysis

5) Get published by writing a review or a response 

Writing reviews is a good way to get published – especially for people who are in the early stages of their career. It’s a chance to practice at writing a piece for publication, and get a free copy of a book that you want. We publish more reviews than papers so we’re constantly looking for reviewers.

Some journals, including ours, publish replies to papers that have been published in the same journal. Editors quite like to publish replies to previous papers because it stimulates discussion.
Yujin Nagasawa, co-editor and review editor of the European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, philosophy of religion editor of Philosophy Compass

6) Don’t forget about international readers

We get people who write from America who assume everyone knows the American system – and the same happens with UK writers. Because we’re an international journal, we need writers to include that international context.
Hugh McLaughlin, editor in chief, Social Work Education – the International Journal

7) Don’t try to cram your PhD into a 6,000 word paper

Sometimes people want to throw everything in at once and hit too many objectives. We get people who try to tell us their whole PhD in 6,000 words and it just doesn’t work. More experienced writers will write two or three papers from one project, using a specific aspect of their research as a hook.
Hugh McLaughlin, editor in chief, Social Work Education – the International Journal

Submitting your work

8) Pick the right journal: it’s a bad sign if you don’t recognise any of the editorial board

Check that your article is within the scope of the journal that you are submitting to. This seems so obvious but it’s surprising how many articles are submitted to journals that are completely inappropriate. It is a bad sign if you do not recognise the names of any members of the editorial board. Ideally look through a number of recent issues to ensure that it is publishing articles on the same topic and that are of similar quality and impact.
Ian Russell, editorial director for science at Oxford University Press

9) Always follow the correct submissions procedures

Often authors don’t spend the 10 minutes it takes to read the instructions to authors which wastes enormous quantities of time for both the author and the editor and stretches the process when it does not need to
Tangali Sudarshan, editor, Surface Engineering

10) Don’t repeat your abstract in the cover letter
We look to the cover letter for an indication from you about what you think is most interesting and significant about the paper, and why you think it is a good fit for the journal. There is no need to repeat the abstract or go through the content of the paper in detail – we will read the paper itself to find out what it says. The cover letter is a place for a bigger picture outline, plus any other information that you would like us to have.
Deborah Sweet, editor of Cell Stem Cell and publishing director at Cell Press

11) A common reason for rejections is lack of context

Make sure that it is clear where your research sits within the wider scholarly landscape, and which gaps in knowledge it’s addressing. A common reason for articles being rejected after peer review is this lack of context or lack of clarity about why the research is important.
Jane Winters, executive editor of the Institute of Historical Research’s journal, Historical Research and associate editor of Frontiers in Digital Humanities: Digital History

12) Don’t over-state your methodology

Ethnography seems to be the trendy method of the moment, so lots of articles submitted claim to be based on it. However, closer inspection reveals quite limited and standard interview data. A couple of interviews in a café do not constitute ethnography. Be clear – early on – about the nature and scope of your data collection. The same goes for the use of theory. If a theoretical insight is useful to your analysis, use it consistently throughout your argument and text.
Fiona Macaulay, editorial board, Journal of Latin American Studies

Dealing with feedback

13) Respond directly (and calmly) to reviewer comments

When resubmitting a paper following revisions, include a detailed document summarising all the changes suggested by the reviewers, and how you have changed your manuscript in light of them. Stick to the facts, and don’t rant. Don’t respond to reviewer feedback as soon as you get it. Read it, think about it for several days, discuss it with others, and then draft a response.
Helen Ball, editorial board, Journal of Human Lactation 

14) Revise and resubmit: don’t give up after getting through all the major hurdles

You’d be surprised how many authors who receive the standard “revise and resubmit” letter never actually do so. But it is worth doing – some authors who get asked to do major revisions persevere and end up getting their work published, yet others, who had far less to do, never resubmit. It seems silly to get through the major hurdles of writing the article, getting it past the editors and back from peer review only to then give up.
Fiona Macaulay, editorial board, Journal of Latin American Studies

15) It is acceptable to challenge reviewers, with good justification

It is acceptable to decline a reviewer’s suggestion to change a component of your article if you have a good justification, or can (politely) argue why the reviewer is wrong. A rational explanation will be accepted by editors, especially if it is clear you have considered all the feedback received and accepted some of it.
Helen Ball, editorial board of Journal of Human Lactation

16) Think about how quickly you want to see your paper published

Some journals rank more highly than others and so your risk of rejection is going to be greater. People need to think about whether or not they need to see their work published quickly – because certain journals will take longer. Some journals, like ours, also do advance access so once the article is accepted it appears on the journal website. This is important if you’re preparing for a job interview and need to show that you are publishable.
Hugh McLaughlin, editor in chief, Social Work Education – the International Journal

17) Remember: when you read published papers you only see the finished article

Publishing in top journals is a challenge for everyone, but it may seem easier for other people. When you read published papers you see the finished article, not the first draft, nor the first revise and resubmit, nor any of the intermediate versions – and you never see the failures.
Philip Powell, managing editor of the Information Systems Journal

http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jan/03/how-to-get-published-in-an-academic-journal-top-tips-from-editors

10 tips Writing your scientific article for an academic journal

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Jul

25

1) Have a strategy, make a plan

Why do you want to write for journals? What is your purpose? Are you writing for research assessment? Or to make a difference? Are you writing to have an impact factor or to have an impact? Do you want to develop a profile in a specific area? Will this determine which journals you write for? Have you taken their impact factors into account?

Have you researched other researchers in your field – where have they published recently? Which group or conversation can you see yourself joining? Some people write the paper first and then look for a ‘home’ for it, but since everything in your article – content, focus, structure, style – will be shaped for a specific journal, save yourself time by deciding on your target journal and work out how to write in a way that suits that journal.

Having a writing strategy means making sure you have both external drivers – such as scoring points in research assessment or climbing the promotion ladder – and internal drivers – which means working out why writing for academic journals matters to you. This will help you maintain the motivation you’ll need to write and publish over the long term. Since the time between submission and publication can be up to two years (though in some fields it’s much less) you need to be clear about your motivation.

2) Analyse writing in journals in your field

Take a couple of journals in your field that you will target now or soon. Scan all the abstracts over the past few issues. Analyse them: look closely at all first and last sentences. The first sentence (usually) gives the rationale for the research, and the last asserts a ‘contribution to knowledge’. But the word ‘contribution’ may not be there – it’s associated with the doctorate. So which words are used? What constitutes new knowledge in this journal at this time? How can you construct a similar form of contribution from the work you did? What two sentences will you write to start and end your abstract for that journal?

Scan other sections of the articles: how are they structured? What are the components of the argument? Highlight all the topic sentences – the first sentences of every paragraph – to show the stages in the argument. Can you see an emerging taxonomy of writing genres in this journal? Can you define the different types of paper, different structures and decide which one will work best in your paper? Select two types of paper: one that’s the type of paper you can use as a model for yours, and one that you can cite in your paper, thereby joining the research conversation that is ongoing in that journal.

3) Do an outline and just write

Which type of writer are you: do you always do an outline before you write, or do you just dive in and start writing? Or do you do a bit of both? Both outlining and just writing are useful, and it is therefore a good idea to use both. However, make your outline very detailed: outline the main sections and calibrate these with your target journal.

What types of headings are normally used there? How long are the sections usually? Set word limits for your sections, sub-sections and, if need be, for sub-sub-sections. This involves deciding about content that you want to include, so it may take time, and feedback would help at this stage.

When you sit down to write, what exactly are you doing:using writing to develop your ideas or writing to document your work? Are you using your outline as an agenda for writing sections of your article? Define your writing task by thinking about verbs – they define purpose: to summarise, overview, critique, define, introduce, conclude etc.

4) Get feedback from start to finish

Even at the earliest stages, discuss your idea for a paper with four or five people, get feedback on your draft abstract. It will only take them a couple of minutes to read it and respond. Do multiple revisions before you submit your article to the journal.

5) Set specific writing goals and sub-goals

Making your writing goals specific means defining the content, verb and word length for the section. This means not having a writing goal like, ‘I plan to have this article written by the end of the year’ but ‘My next writing goal is to summarise and critique twelve articles for the literature review section in 800 words on Tuesday between 9am and 10.30’. Some people see this as too mechanical for academic writing, but it is a way of forcing yourself to make decisions about content, sequence and proportion for your article.

6) Write with others

While most people see writing as a solitary activity, communal writing – writing with others who are writing – can help to develop confidence, fluency and focus. It can help you develop the discipline of regular writing. Doing your academic writing in groups or at writing retreats are ways of working on your own writing, but – if you unplug from email, internet and all other devices – also developing the concentration needed for regular, high-level academic writing.

At some point – ideally at regular intervals – you can get a lot more done if you just focus on writing. If this seems like common sense, it isn’t common practice. Most people do several things at once, but this won’t always work for regular journal article writing. At some point, it pays to privilege writing over all other tasks, for a defined period, such as 90 minutes, which is long enough to get something done on your paper, but not so long that it’s impossible to find the time.

7) Do a warm up before you write

While you are deciding what you want to write about, an initial warm up that works is to write for five minutes, in sentences, in answer to the question: ‘What writing for publication have you done [or the closest thing to it], and what do you want to do in the long, medium and short term?’

Once you have started writing your article, use a variation on this question as a warm up – what writing for this project have you done, and what do you want to do in the long, medium and short term? Top tip: end each session of writing with a ‘writing instruction’ for yourself to use in your next session, for example, ‘on Monday from 9 to 10am, I will draft the conclusion section in 500 words’.

As discussed, if there are no numbers, there are no goals. Goals that work need to be specific, and you need to monitor the extent to which you achieve them. This is how you learn to set realistic targets.

8) Analyse reviewers’ feedback on your submission

What exactly are they asking you to do? Work out whether they want you to add or cut something. How much? Where? Write out a list of revision actions. When you resubmit your article include this in your report to the journal, specifying how you have responded to the reviewers’ feedback. If your article was rejected, it is still useful to analyse feedback, work out why and revise it for somewhere else.

Most feedback will help you improve your paper and, perhaps, your journal article writing, but sometimes it may seem overheated, personalised or even vindictive. Some of it may even seem unprofessional. Discuss reviewers’ feedback – see what others think of it. You may find that other people – even eminent researchers – still get rejections and negative reviews; any non-rejection is a cause for celebration. Revise and resubmit as soon as you can.

9) Be persistent, thick-skinned and resilient

These are qualities that you may develop over time – or you may already have them. It may be easier to develop them in discussion with others who are writing for journals.

10) Take care of yourself

Writing for academic journals is highly competitive. It can be extremely stressful. Even making time to write can be stressful. And there are health risks in sitting for long periods, so try not to sit writing for more than an hour at a time. Finally, be sure to celebrate thoroughly when your article is accepted. Remind yourself that writing for academic journals is what you want to do – that your writing will make a difference in some way.

These points are taken from the 3rd edition of Writing for Academic Journals.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/sep/06/academic-journal-writing-top-tips

2015 smonagenes group publication

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Jul

4

Rike Oktarianti, Kartika Senjarini, Toshiya Hayano , Fatchiyah Fatchiyah , Aulanni’am. Proteomic analysis of immunogenic proteins from salivary glands of Aedes aegypti. Journal of Infection and Public Health (2015) xxx, xxx—xxx (InPress) doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2015.04.022

Rista Nikmatu Rohmah, Edi Widjajanto, Fatchiyah Fatchiyah. Protective effect of CSN1S2 protein of goat milk on ileum microstructure and inflammation in rat-CFA-induced rheumatoid arthritis. Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2015; 5(7): 564-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2222-1808(15)60837-4

Rivqi Rifa Bia, Regina Putri Virgirinia, Bambang Setiawan, Aris Soewondo,Fatchiyah Fatchiyah. Goat milk CSN1S2 is able to decrease the severity scoring, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and advanced glycation end products receptor expression in complete Freund’s adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis model of rats. Biomarker and Genomic Medicine. 2015, xx: 1-8  DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bgm.2015.02.001

Fatchiyah Fatchiyah, Ferlany Hardiyanti, Nashi Widodo Selective Inhibition on RAGE-binding AGEs Required by Bioactive Peptide Alpha-S2 Case in Protein from Goat Ethawah Breed Milk: Study of Biological Modeling. Acta Informatica Medica01/2015; 23(2): 90-96. DOI:10.5455/aim.2015.23.90-96

Sri hardyastutie, A, D.W.Soeatmadji, Fatchiyah Fatah, and Aulanni’am. Relation of Elevated Serum Lipase to Indonesian Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Progression.Biomedical Research 2015; 26 (2): 293-298

Fatchiyah Fatchiyah, SJ Raharjo, FRP Dewi. Virtual Selectivity Peptides of Csn1s2 Protein of Local Goat Ethawah Breeds Milk Modulate Biological Mechanism Of Calmodulin. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 2015 April;; 6(2): (B) 707 – 718

Choirunil Chotimah, Gatot Ciptadi, Bambang Setiawan, Fatchiyah Fatchiyah. CSN1S2 protein of goat milk inhibits the decrease of viability and increases the proliferation of MC3T3E1 pre-osteoblast cell in methyl  glyoxal exposure. Elsevier – Asian Pacific J Tropical Disease 2015; 5(3): 219-223

Research and knowledge Management

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Apr

23

by Fatchiyah (Dept Biology, FMIPA UB)
•Research Management (RM) focuses mainly on abilities to prepare, execute, disseminate, evaluate and sustain research activities within a certain  frame with different settings and strategies in higher education systems or in private sector.
•
•Knowledge management (KM)focuses on how an organization (either higher education system or private sector) identifies, creates, captures , acquires, shares and leverages knowledge.
•
•Both consist of
RM                                  KM
•To Get                           To build
•To Use                          To Assess
•To Learn                      To Sustain
•To Contribute             To divest

Indicators Components of Research Performance

• Organizational knowledge
• Innovation
• Organizational learning
• R & D personnel
• Technology transfer
• Contract services
• Research project time
• R & D facilitations
• Technology implicit transfer
• Customers‘ satisfaction
• Job satisfaction
• Information

Trust & Scientific Work

  1. Criterion required for an egalitarian cooperation: Understanding research as part of the job-description or business
  2. Quality of Research: Articles published in international refereed journals; scientific books by internationally well-known publishers; citations
  3. Research Activity: Minimum quality standard; reports in national journals; working papers; conference proceedings; conference presentation
  4. Impact of Research: citation by other researchers; invited and plenary presentations; number of foreign co-authors
  5. Activity in Educating young scientists: doctoral degree produced; number of doctoral students supervised
  6. Activity in scientific community: membership in editorial boards; edited books and special issues of journals; services as an expert; scientific conferences organized, memberships in program committees

more detail; Research and Knowledge management

Pembuatan Roadmap Penelitian

TACIT KNOWLEDGE

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Apr

23

by Fatchiyah (dept Biology, FMIPA UB)

Do you know the TACIT KNOWLEDGE?

Not all knowledge is created equally.

We think of knowledge as something that can be recorded in words, visualized and taught. However, this isn’t always the case. Tacit knowledge is a class of knowledge that’s difficult to communicate.

Definition: Tacit Knowledge

Tacit knowledge is knowledge that’s difficult to write down, visualize or transfer from one person to another.
Tacit knowledge is a particular challenge for knowledge management. Firms would like to prevent knowledge loss due to employee turnover. However, tacit knowledge almost always goes with the employee.

Tacit knowledge is essential to competitive advantage because it’s difficult for competitors to copy. It’s the reason some firms pump out innovation after innovation while other firms struggle.

The following examples are business critical knowledge that are difficult to write down, visualize and teach.

1. How to speak a language

It’s notoriously difficult to write down the rules of a language. It’s well accepted that learning a language requires immersion (using the language for long periods of time).

2. Innovation

Innovation is an illusive skill. Some individuals struggle with innovation for many decades with little success. Other individuals seem to innovate effortlessly for a period of time.

3. Leadership

Complex social skills such as leadership are difficult to teach. There’s no process or training that can be guaranteed to make you a leader. Leadership extends from experience.

4. Aesthetic Sense

Aesthetics explains why art and culture is appealing. It’s difficult to verbalize the appeal of a work of art. It’s even more difficult to teach an aesthetic sense.

Aesthetic sense is ingrained in an individual’s world view. It can be cultivated but not taught.

5. Sales

Sales is another complex social skill that’s fairly difficult to teach. Great salespeople are commonly described as “naturals” because it’s difficult to transfer the skill to others.

6. Body Language

Body language is incredibly important to communication. However, it’s difficult to teach.

7. Intuition

Intuition is the ability to understand things without using logic. It’s important to innovation and decision making.

8. Humor

It’s not always possible to explain why something is funny. It’s difficult to teach a sense of humor. For example, humor requires a particular timing that’s considered intuitive.

9. Snowboarding

Tasks that require physical coordination such as riding a snowboard or bicycle are considered tacit knowledge.

10. Emotional Intelligence

Emotional intelligence is the ability to read and use emotions to influence outcomes. It’s difficult to teach or express.

If you enjoyed this article, please share it.

More detail  tacit KNOWLEDGE

Fatchiyah menjadi satu-satunya wakil Indonesia diundang di 3rd International Conference on Endocrinology November 02-04, 2015 Georgia, Atlanta, USA

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Apr

16

Syukur Alhamdulillah, sebuah kebanggaan yang tidak disangka-sangka, berbasis pada publikasi international di Elsevier tepatnya di Asia Pasific Journal Tropical Disease untuk Edisi MArch 2015, Fatchiyah menjadi satu-satunya wakil Indonesia yang diundang sebagai “honorable speaker” di 3rd International Conference on Endocrinology November 02-04, 2015 Georgia, Atlanta, USA.dengan topik :

Fatchiyah F

Brawijaya University, Indonesia

Title: Caprine milk alpha-S2 casein protein of ethawah breeds is able to enhance biological activities related with gene susceptibility of human disease regulation

http://endocrinology.conferenceseries.com/scientific-program.php?day=1&sid=923&date=2015-11-02

 

 

 

 

Jadual Kuliah Biologi Molekuler (MAB 4162: 2sks) JB-UB, Semester Ganjil 2014-2015

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Oct

1

Kelas: A

 

Hari: Rabu                                           07:30-09:15                            Ruang: MP 2.4

No

Tanggal

Topik

Dosen

Ket
1 10-9-14 Pendahuluan, konsep dasar dan prespektif biologi molekuler

WN
2 18-9-14 –   Struktur Molekuler dari gen (DNA-RNA, tRNA, rRNA, snRNA)Kromosom dan Rearrangement Chromosome

ELA
3 24-9-14 Ekspresi Gen : Transkripsi & modifikasi post transkripsi: splicing, capping, Poly-A Translasi & nodifikasi post translasi dari Sinthesis Protein, Proses sintesis gen tRNA & rRNA

F
4 01-10-14 Mekanisme Replikasi DNA dan ensim-ensim yang berperanMekanisme Homologous Recombinan

ELA
5 08-10-14 Site-specific recombination and transposition

ELA

Kuis/tt
6 15-10-14 Gene Regulation Mechanism: Reg. sequence in protein coding gene

F
7 22-10-14 Gene Regulation Mechanism: cascade signaling pathway for controlling gene activity

F

Kuis/tt
8 27-10-14

UTS

F, ELA
05-11-14

WN
9 12-11-14 Struktur dasar Protein: determinasi & klasifikasi

SW

 
10 19-11-14 Protein modification

SW

Kuis/tt
11 26-11-14 Proteomics

SW
12 03-12-14 Interaction of DNA-Protein & Protein-Protein in Eukaryotes

SW

Kuis/tt
13 10-12-14 Aplikasi biologi molekuler bidang forensic dan biomedik

F

SCL, Presentasi, makalah
14 17-12-14 Aplikasi biologi molekuler pada tanaman

ELA

SCL, Presentasi, makalah
15 24-12-14 Molecular Biology Application research based on protein analysis

SW

SCL, Presentasi, makalah

Keterangan:

F (Prof Fatchiyah, Ph.D); ELA (Dr.Ir. Estri Laras A., MSc.St), SW (Dr. Sri Widyarti, MS), WN (Prof. Wolfgang Nellen)

 

Kelas: B

 

Hari: Rabu                                           9:20-11:00                              Ruang: MP 1.4

No

Tanggal

Topik

Dosen

Ket
1 10-9-14 Pendahuluan, konsep dasar dan prespektif biologi molekuler

WN

 Kuis/tt
2 18-9-14 –   Struktur Molekuler dari gen (DNA-RNA, tRNA, rRNA, snRNA)-  Kromosom dan Rearrangement Chromosome

ELA
3 24-9-14 Ekspresi Gen : Transkripsi & modifikasi post transkripsi: splicing, capping, Poly-A Translasi & nodifikasi post translasi dari Sinthesis Protein, Proses sintesis gen tRNA & rRNA

F
4 01-10-14 Mekanisme Replikasi DNA dan ensim-ensim yang berperanMekanisme Homologous Recombinan

ELA
5 08-10-14 Site-specific recombination and transposition

ELA

 Kuis/tt
6 15-10-14 Gene Regulation Mechanism: Reg. sequence in protein coding gene & cascade signaling pathway for controlling gene activity

F
7 22-10-14 Gene Regulation Mechanism: cascade signaling pathway for controlling gene activity

F

 Kuis/tt
8 27-10-14

UTS

F, ELA
05-11-14

WN
9 12-11-14 Struktur dasar Protein: determinasi & klasifikasi

SP

 
10 19-11-14 Protein modification

SP
11 26-11-14 Proteomics

SP
12 03-12-14 Interaction of DNA-Protein & Protein-Protein in Eukaryotes

SP

Kuis/tt
13 10-12-14 Aplikasi biologi molekuler bidang forensic dan biomedik

F

SCL, Presentasi, makalah
14 17-12-14 Aplikasi biologi molekuler pada tanaman

ELA

SCL, Presentasi, makalah
15 24-12-14 Molecular Biology Application research based on protein analysis

SP

SCL, Presentasi, makalah

Keterangan:

F (Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D); ELA (Prof.Dr.Ir. Estri Laras A., MSc.St), SP (Sofy Permana, MSc. DSc.), WN (Prof. Wolfgang Nellen)

 

New Publications of my group research

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Aug

16

Hi students and researchers,

a lot of  new publication, please take a look and click here

2015

Choirunil Chotimah, Gatot Ciptadi, Bambang Setiawan, Fatchiyah Fatchiyah. CSN1S2 protein of goat milk inhibits the decrease of viability and increases the proliferation of MC3T3E1 pre-osteoblast cell in methyl  glyoxal exposure. Elsevier – Asian Pac J Trop Dis 2015; 5(3): 219-223

2014

Sentot Joko Raharjo, Chanif Mahdi, Nurdiana, Takheshi Kikuchi, Fatchiyah Fatchiyah. Binding energy calculation patchouli alcohol isomer-cyclooxygenase complexes  as suggestion COX-1/ COX-2 inhibitor selective.  Hindawi – Advance in Bioinformatics, 2014 (Article in Press)

Rike Oktarianti, Kartika Senjarini, Fatchiyah Fatchiyah, Aulanni’am. Immunogenic Protein from Salivary Gland of Aedes aegypti Against to Human Sera. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(8) July 2014, Pages: 101-107

Srihardyastutie, A, D.W.Soeatmadji, Fatchiyah, and Aulanni’am. The Relationship between HbA1c, Insulin Resistance and Changes of Insulin Secretion in Indonesian Type 2 Diabetic Subjects. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 8(8) July 2014, Pages: 25-30

and abstract of publication click here

 

In silico analysis on Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma mechanism

By Prof. Fatchiyah, Ph.D.

Apr

10

Anggun Indah Budiningrum, Achmad Rofi’i, Suharjono Suharjono, Fatchiyah Fatchiyah. LMP-1 and Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC). Cukurova Med J. 2014; 39(3): 480-487 (abstract)